Completeness check
Identify missing part, mold, resin or output data before quoting.
04
RFQ / PROJECT FIT
A better brief produces a better machine shortlist.
Use this worksheet to organize the inputs needed to evaluate clamping unit, injection unit, drive architecture, auxiliaries and production-cell integration.
ATTACH IF AVAILABLE
Give engineering the source files.
- 012D or 3D part drawing
- 02Mold drawing and external dimensions
- 03Resin grade and material data sheet
- 04Current machine and cycle record
- 05Factory layout and utility standard
- 06Destination-market documentation needs
Your data stays with you
The worksheet runs in your browser. Nothing is uploaded. A buyer basis explicitly continued from the specification tool is read once from this tab's session storage and deleted immediately; an allowlisted guide token only reveals its fixed empty fields and never copies arbitrary query values. The worksheet then creates a plain-text project brief you can review and copy.
Four conversations that move a project forward.
Machine fit
Compare architecture and critical configuration against the project inputs.
Scope & acceptance
Define options, auxiliaries, interfaces, testing and exclusions.
Quotation scope
Align machine, options, delivery basis, installation and service terms.
PLANT-WIDE MATERIAL SCOPE
Does the project include central storage, routing, orders or material-trace evidence?
Define the materials, sources, destinations, routes, supply orders, lots, exceptions and reconciliation boundary before placing those requirements inside the machine and cell brief.
Open the central material-supply checklistKeep separate
- Machine project fit and plant-wide material routing
- IMM-to-MES jobs and material-supply orders
- Standard scope and configured evidence
CAVITY-PRESSURE MEASUREMENT SCOPE
Does the project include in-mold pressure sensing or a process-monitoring output?
Define the mold, cavities, sensor relationship, complete channel, measurement semantics, decision owner and configured evidence before placing monitoring requirements inside the machine and cell brief.
Open the cavity-pressure measurement checklistKeep separate
- Pressure field and installed measurement chain
- Monitoring output and physical part disposition
- Named vendor example and configured support
MAXIMUM CLAMPING-FORCE ACCEPTANCE
Must the exact machine's maximum clamping force be test-agreed and accepted?
Keep the nominal/rated value separate from the selected method, measurement chain, raw record, reported result, limitations, contractual criterion and final disposition.
Open the maximum-force acceptance checklistKeep separate
- Mold/process clamp demand and machine capability
- Nominal label and measured result
- Performance evidence and safety/conformity
PLATEN-PARALLELISM ACCEPTANCE
Does the project require a separate platen-parallelism record?
Keep the selected method and edition, machine state, datums, measurement locations, raw readings, result expression, limitations, contractual criterion and final disposition together.
Open the platen-parallelism acceptance checklistKeep separate
- Platen drawings and measured parallelism
- Maximum clamping force and parallelism evidence
- Performance evidence and safety/conformity
NOMINAL OPENING-FORCE ACCEPTANCE
Must the exact machine's nominal opening-force claim be test-agreed and accepted?
Keep the quoted definition/value/unit separate from the selected method, opening-state basis, measurement chain, raw observations, reported result, limitations and final disposition.
Open the nominal opening-force acceptance checklistKeep separate
- Quoted value, controller entry and controlled result
- Opening force, stroke, daylight and mold access
- Opening force, demolding, ejector, cycle and safety
PLASTICIZING-CAPACITY ACCEPTANCE
Must the exact machine's quoted plasticizing-capacity field be test-agreed and accepted?
Keep the quoted definition, value, unit and reference material separate from the selected method, exact plasticizing configuration, controlled conditions, measurement chain, raw observations, result, limitations and final disposition.
Open the plasticizing-capacity acceptance checklistKeep separate
- Quoted comparison field and required project recovery
- EUROMAP 19 and EUROMAP 4 evidence questions
- Machine-side result, production output and material suitability
ACTUAL-INJECTION-EFFICIENCY ACCEPTANCE
Must the exact injection unit's quoted EUROMAP 4 field be test-agreed and accepted?
Keep the original field and exact screw-or-plunger configuration together with the selected method, theoretical basis, controlled test state, measurement chain, raw observations, calculation, limitations and final disposition.
Open the actual-injection-efficiency acceptance checklistKeep separate
- EUROMAP 4 coefficient and energy efficiency
- Comparison record and pressure/flow capability
- Machine-side result, production output and part quality
HYDRAULIC-FLUID CLEANLINESS ACCEPTANCE
Must the exact hydraulic circuit's cleanliness and filtration evidence be agreed before acceptance?
Keep the machine, circuit, fluid fill and filter state together with the buyer-owned target, controlled sample chain, selected method, instrument traceability, raw particle data, reported code, limitations and final disposition.
Open the hydraulic-fluid cleanliness acceptance checklistKeep separate
- Drive architecture and the configured cleanliness record
- Pressure/flow endpoints and particle-contamination evidence
- Filter-element data and installed-circuit acceptance