Lock the quoted field
Preserve the supplier's exact label, value, unit, material basis, source revision and evidence status before normalizing anything.
G34
PLASTICIZING / ACCEPTANCE RECORD
A quoted plasticizing capacity is not proof of the exact machine’s controlled plasticizing result.
Build one machine-, injection-unit- and plasticizing-configuration-specific acceptance record from the original quoted field through the agreed method, material and test-state basis, measurement chain, raw observations, reported result, limitations, criterion and final disposition.
ANSWER FIRST
Accept the evidence record—not a detached catalogue rate.
A mass-per-time or throughput field becomes comparable only when it stays attached to the exact offered configuration, original definition and unit, reference material, selected method, controlled conditions and auditable result. Keep required project recovery and production proof in their own decisions.
Carry the fixed acceptance context into the RFQPublication boundary
No NEW ORIENTAL IMM plasticizing-capacity test, apparatus, instrument, calibration, material, setting, raw record, result, EUROMAP 19 implementation or compliance, ISO 20430 compliance, certification, conformity or passed acceptance is claimed.
Unknown supplier evidence remains open. This route supplies no calculation of project demand and no default procedure, equipment, material, setting, sample count, threshold or pass/fail rule.
ONE OWNER / SIX ADJACENT DECISIONS
Keep the quoted-rate record separate from project performance.
Reuse the controlled configuration identity across reviews, but do not let one evidence row take ownership of recovery, hardware, cycle, output or complete acceptance.
Scroll horizontally to view all columns.
| Decision | Owns | Stays separate |
|---|---|---|
| Plasticizing-capacity acceptance record | One exact machine, injection unit and plasticizing configuration; the supplier's original quoted field; selected method and edition; controlled conditions; measurement chain; raw observations; reported result; limitations; contractual criterion and disposition. | It does not calculate project demand, prescribe a test procedure, prove a supplier result or release another material, configuration or production process. |
| Shot and plasticizing-demand planning | Part and runner mass, intended material, shot volume, average demand, actual recovery window, residence questions and the project trial needed to screen an injection unit. | Required project rate is not the same as a measured machine-side comparison value, and a quoted comparison value does not prove recovery in the production sequence. |
| Injection speed and injection rate | Forward screw speed, calculated or stated injection volume flow, fill profile, pressure limit and configured mold/material confirmation. | Injection-stage flow is not screw-rotation plasticizing capacity, recovery performance or a EUROMAP 19 result. |
| Injection-pressure quote normalization | Pressure location and definition, force basis, flow, stroke, shot volume, simultaneous limits and the exact injection-unit quotation row. | EUROMAP 4 injection-efficiency context and quoted pressure fields do not determine plasticizing capacity or make EUROMAP 4 and EUROMAP 19 interchangeable. |
| Resin, screw and barrel suitability | Exact resin grade, filler and additive state, screw geometry, metallurgy, non-return valve, thermal history, abrasion, corrosion and residence risks. | A plasticizing-capacity record does not approve material compatibility, component life, melt quality or the configured hardware selection. |
| Production cycle and accepted output | The complete mold, resin, injection, cooling, plasticizing, ejection, automation, quality, downtime and accepted-part measurement boundary. | A machine-side comparison rate does not establish recovery time, stable cycle, hourly output, accepted yield or production capability. |
| Complete FAT and SAT programme | The approved machine and cell scope, test responsibilities, utilities, interfaces, conditions, instruments, witnesses, deviations, retest and final acceptance authority. | This route contributes one controlled evidence row; it is not the complete FAT/SAT plan, safety validation or production release. |
SOURCE STATUS / CLAIM LIMIT
Use every source only for the question it actually answers.
Historical recommendation, draft data model, named-OEM context, current safety standard and project evidence remain separate rows.
Scroll horizontally to view all columns.
| Source | Public status | May inform | Cannot release |
|---|---|---|---|
| EUROMAP technical-recommendations catalogue | Current catalogue reviewed 2 August 2026; lists EUROMAP 19 (1995) for plasticizing capacity and separately lists EUROMAP 4 (1994) for actual injection efficiency. | Document number, historical year, public title and the separate evidence question owned by each recommendation. | An ISO status, legal requirement, certification, universal current procedure, supplier capability, machine result or project acceptance. |
| EUROMAP 19 (1995) | Official historical recommendation titled for determination of plasticizing capacity under defined comparison conditions. | The candidate method-and-edition row when project parties agree its contractual applicability for the exact machine and plasticizing configuration. | A fixed apparatus, material, temperature, shot, speed, back pressure, sequence, repetition count, setting, tolerance, pass/fail rule or NEW ORIENTAL IMM result. |
| EUROMAP 4 (1994) | Official historical recommendation separately titled for determination of actual injection efficiency. | A separate injection-stage record involving theoretical and actual injection quantities when that question is contractually selected. | Plasticizing capacity, recovery performance, energy efficiency, production efficiency, part quality or an interchangeable EUROMAP 19 method. |
| EUROMAP 102 Draft 1.0 (January 2026) | Official draft technical-data model; it remains Draft 1.0 and distinguishes type-level options from the configured delivered instance. | Why injection-unit, screw/barrel combination, throughput and related technical fields must remain attached to one controlled configuration. | A final standard, EUROMAP 19 test record, supplier digital twin, delivered configuration, interoperability, conformity or measured result. |
| Shibaura Machine named-OEM specification | Current manufacturer-hosted series document that places plasticizing capacity beside specific injection-unit, screw and reference-material columns. | The need to preserve the named configuration, material basis, original unit and the manufacturer's stated variability boundary. | A NEW ORIENTAL IMM option, value, test method, material fit, performance result or transferable OEM relationship. |
| ARBURG Today 88/2025 technical article | Current manufacturer-authored context describing plasticizing selection as dependent on material, components, process parameters, residence and utilization. | The RFQ questions that keep the rate record separate from material/hardware suitability and production confirmation. | ARBURG tools, software, settings, hardware, advice, performance or capability for NEW ORIENTAL IMM. |
| ISO 20430:2020 | Published injection-moulding-machine safety standard, reviewed and confirmed in 2025. | A separate machine-safety scope when the proposed supply and destination make it applicable. | A plasticizing-capacity method, measured rate, supplier compliance, conformity, certification, safety result or machine acceptance. |
| Project-specific controlled evidence | Not supplied for a NEW ORIENTAL IMM machine, injection unit or plasticizing configuration. | Only the exact quotation, configuration, agreed method, conditions, instrument records, raw observations, result, limitations and signed disposition received for the project. | Any missing supplier value, test capability, apparatus, material, setting, calibration, result, compliance, certification or passed acceptance. |
FIXED RFQ CONTRACT / 18 FIELDS
Carry configuration, method, raw evidence and disposition together.
Unknown entries remain open. No catalogue title, controller screen, OEM example or other project's record may silently fill them.
Scroll horizontally to view all columns.
| RFQ field | Record | Boundary |
|---|---|---|
| Exact machine, injection-unit and plasticizing configuration | Manufacturer, model, serial or project identity; injection-unit and drive designation; installed plasticizing assembly and every option that changes the quoted field. | A machine family or clamping-force label does not identify the as-quoted or as-tested configuration. |
| Controlled quotation, specification, drawing and software revisions | Revision, date, owner and precedence for each document that identifies the offered and test-state configuration. | An undated table, screenshot or superseded brochure does not close the configuration record. |
| Quoted field definition, value, unit and reference material | Supplier's original label, number, unit, material basis, value status and source location without silent translation or conversion. | A mass rate, volume rate, throughput label, calculated field and measured result are not interchangeable by name alone. |
| Decision purpose and acceptance stage | Screening, quotation normalization, contract review, FAT, SAT or another named stage and the decision the result is intended to support. | One comparison-stage result does not release production output or a later acceptance stage. |
| Selected method, document year or edition and applicability | Exact method identity, historical year or edition, selected clauses or supplier procedure and written reason it applies to this configuration. | Catalogue presence does not make EUROMAP 19 mandatory, universal, current for every contract or automatically implemented. |
| Contractual scope and document precedence | Parties, supply boundary, governing project document, approved exceptions and treatment of conflicts between quote, specification and test plan. | This worksheet does not decide contractual authority or replace the signed acceptance plan. |
| Machine, utility, environmental and readiness preconditions | As-agreed machine state, utilities, environmental conditions, readiness criteria and any condition that can affect the record. | No universal readiness condition, utility value or warm-up rule is prescribed here. |
| Test material identity, batch, condition and source documents | Material manufacturer and grade, batch or lot, additive/filler/color state, conditioning and the controlled material documents used by the test owner. | A reference-material result is not an actual-resin production result and cannot be transferred to another grade by assumption. |
| Screw, barrel, non-return valve, nozzle and drive identity and condition | Part numbers or controlled geometry identifiers, diameter, wear or inspection state, installed drive and any component change relevant to the result. | The record does not approve component suitability, metallurgy, wear life, corrosion resistance or melt quality. |
| Measurement principle, test apparatus and measurement locations | Selected principle, apparatus identity or drawing, measurement points, data path and responsible test owner as required by the agreed method. | No apparatus, nozzle, sensor, balance, timer or measurement location is supplied or recommended by this page. |
| Instrument identity, range and calibration or verification traceability | Instrument manufacturer/model/serial, range, resolution where relevant, calibration or verification record, date, status and traceability owner. | An instrument name or certificate title alone does not prove suitability, calibration validity, accuracy or a machine result. |
| Melt and thermal condition with quality observations | Agreed thermal-state definitions, measurement locations, recorded observations, validity checks and any visible or measured condition required by the selected plan. | No fixed temperature, variation, homogeneity criterion, degradation rule or material setting is published here. |
| Shot, operating state, sequence and settings record | The controlled shot/state/sequence references and actual settings retained by the test owner, including deviations from the approved plan. | The page provides no default shot, cycle, screw speed, back pressure, timing, overlap or operating procedure. |
| Sampling, repetitions and raw mass, time and temperature observations | Complete raw observations, sample identity, inclusion/exclusion decisions, interruptions, timestamps and the approved repetition or sampling reference. | No sample count, repetition count, measurement interval or data-exclusion rule is prescribed. |
| Calculation, reported result, expression, unit and rounding treatment | Traceable calculation or software record, original and reported result, unit conversion, rounding, reviewer and source file. | A calculated or reported comparison value does not become recovery time, production throughput, output or actual-material performance. |
| Uncertainty, limitations and non-transferability | Known measurement and method limitations, material/configuration scope, excluded conclusions and conditions that prevent comparison or transfer. | Matching units do not make results comparable when configuration, material, method or conditions differ. |
| Project criterion and responsible approver | The project-specific acceptance criterion, its source and revision, rationale, responsible technical/commercial approver and decision date. | EUROMAP 19's title does not supply a tolerance, pass/fail threshold, safety margin or project acceptance authority. |
| Witnesses, deviations, retest, report disposition and change triggers | Witness identities, signed deviations, open actions, retest rule, final disposition and configuration/material/method changes that reopen the record. | A report remains limited to its approved evidence state; it does not release a changed machine, screw, material or production job. |
RELEASE SEQUENCE
Move from a quoted field to a bounded acceptance disposition.
Each step preserves uncertainty. A missing configuration, condition, instrument or raw record remains a hold point rather than an assumed result.
Lock the configuration
Tie the field to one machine, injection unit, screw/barrel/non-return-valve/nozzle assembly, drive and software/document baseline.
Agree the method boundary
Record the selected method or supplier procedure, edition, contractual applicability, conditions, measurement chain and responsible owners.
Retain the raw record
Keep all material, state, instrument, observation, calculation, exclusion, deviation and review records needed to audit the reported result.
Limit the disposition
Accept, reject or hold only the stated comparison record. Use separate project evidence for actual-resin recovery, melt/part quality, cycle and output.
PRIMARY SOURCES / BOUNDARY
Use official titles, scope and named context without transferring capability.
Reviewed 2 August 2026. EUROMAP 19 is a historical comparison recommendation listed in the current catalogue; EUROMAP 4 remains a separate injection-efficiency method; EUROMAP 102 remains Draft 1.0; Shibaura and ARBURG are named-OEM context only; ISO 20430 remains machine safety. None proves a NEW ORIENTAL IMM machine, plasticizing configuration, apparatus, instrument, material, setting, result, compliance, certification or delivered case.
Technical Recommendations Catalogue
The catalogue reviewed 2 August 2026 lists EUROMAP 19 (1995) for plasticizing capacity and EUROMAP 4 (1994) for actual injection efficiency as separate recommendations.
Boundary: Catalogue presence supplies a title and historical publication context only; it is not ISO status, law, certification, implementation, supplier capability or a machine result.
EUROMAP 19 (1995) — Determination of the Plasticizing Capacity
Defines a comparison-purpose plasticizing-capacity record under controlled conditions and a mass-per-time result produced by the selected method.
Boundary: Use the official document for its procedure. This page does not reproduce or prescribe apparatus, material, thermal state, shot, ejection, speed, back pressure, sampling, repetition, calculation, tolerance or pass/fail details.
EUROMAP 4 (1994) — Determination of the Actual Injection Efficiency
Separates an injection-stage theoretical basis, actual injection power and coefficient for comparison purposes.
Boundary: It is not EUROMAP 19 plasticizing capacity, machine energy efficiency, production efficiency, recovery performance or part-quality proof; the methods and results are not interchangeable.
EUROMAP 102 Draft 1.0 — Technical Data for Injection Molding Machines
The January 2026 draft distinguishes product-type options from the configured delivered instance and keeps injection units, screw/barrel plastifications, throughput and related technical fields attached to that structure.
Boundary: It remains Draft 1.0. It does not prove a final standard, EUROMAP 19 implementation, supplier data model, delivered configuration, value or result.
EC-SXIII All-Electric Injection Molding Machine Series Brochure
A named-OEM specification example that places plasticizing-capacity values under identified screw and reference-material columns and warns that shot weight and capacity vary with material or molding condition.
Boundary: No Shibaura configuration, value, option, test basis or performance relationship is transferred to NEW ORIENTAL IMM or another machine.
Today 88/2025 — Correctly Scaling Your Plasticising
Manufacturer-authored context connecting plasticizing selection with the actual material, components, process parameters, residence and capacity utilization.
Boundary: ARBURG hardware, tools, settings, recommendations and results apply only to their stated context and are not NEW ORIENTAL IMM evidence.
ISO 20430:2020 — Injection Moulding Machines Safety Requirements
ISO's current public record identifies the safety standard as published and confirmed in 2025.
Boundary: It is not a plasticizing-capacity performance method and does not prove a rate, supplier compliance, conformity, certification, safety result or acceptance.
BUYER QUESTIONS
Plasticizing-capacity acceptance FAQ
These answers keep a quoted comparison value separate from project demand, actual-resin recovery, hardware suitability, production performance, safety and supplier claims.
01Does a quoted plasticizing capacity prove production recovery?+
No. A quoted comparison value remains tied to its exact machine, injection unit, screw/barrel configuration, material, method and conditions. Production recovery requires the intended resin, shot, real cycle sequence, available recovery window, melt/part-quality criteria and a separately agreed trial.
02Is plasticizing capacity the same as shot weight or shot volume?+
No. Shot mass and volume describe material associated with a cycle or injection unit. Plasticizing capacity is a rate under a stated basis. Keep each field, reference material, unit, configuration and evidence status separate.
03Can g/s and kg/h values be converted and compared directly?+
A unit conversion alone is not enough. First align the original field definition, reference material, machine and plasticizing configuration, method, conditions and evidence state. Mark unmatched records non-comparable instead of manufacturing a common result.
04Is EUROMAP 19 an ISO standard, law or certification?+
No. EUROMAP's current catalogue lists it as a historical technical recommendation. Project parties must agree its contractual applicability and selected edition. A title does not create legal force, certification, supplier implementation or a passed result.
05Are EUROMAP 19 and EUROMAP 4 interchangeable?+
No. EUROMAP 19 addresses plasticizing capacity, while EUROMAP 4 addresses actual injection efficiency using a separate injection-stage comparison structure. Neither substitutes for the other or proves energy efficiency, production output or part quality.
06Does ISO 20430 prove plasticizing-capacity acceptance?+
No. ISO 20430:2020 concerns injection-moulding-machine safety within its published scope. It is not the EUROMAP 19 performance method and cannot establish a measured rate, compliance, certification or project acceptance for an offered machine.
07Does this page prescribe the EUROMAP 19 test procedure?+
No. Use the controlled official document and the signed project test plan. This page records method identity, configuration, conditions, instruments, raw evidence, result, limitations and disposition without publishing default apparatus, materials, settings, counts, thresholds or pass/fail rules.
08What should a buyer request before accepting the quoted rate?+
Request the exact machine and plasticizing configuration, controlled source revisions, original field definition/value/unit/material basis, selected method and applicability, test-state and material records, measurement chain, raw observations, calculation, result, limitations, project criterion, witnesses, deviations and final disposition.
PLASTICIZING CAPACITY / NEXT STEP
Send the original quoted field with its complete evidence boundary.
Attach the exact offered configuration, controlled source, reference material, selected method and applicability, test-state and instrument records, raw observations, calculation, reported result, limitations, criterion, deviations and disposition. Keep required project recovery and production proof in separate rows.
Build the machine brief