Seat, channel and datum relationship
Compare the nozzle seat, mold inlet seat, outlet/inlet transition, protrusion/contact position and locating datums from current drawings.
Pair the two controlled drawings before release: seat geometry, melt-channel transition, locating/alignment, contact position and mode, thermal state, acceptance observations and change ownership.
“Nozzle radius” and “sprue-bush orifice” do not close the decision by themselves. The buyer needs one revision-controlled interface section showing how the machine nozzle seats, how the melt path transitions, how the axes are located and how the installed contact will be accepted.
Keep the interface inside the mold-fit reviewA drawing comparison is necessary, but it does not replace a safe mold-specific setup and representative acceptance record.
Compare the nozzle seat, mold inlet seat, outlet/inlet transition, protrusion/contact position and locating datums from current drawings.
Verify the approved contact mode, thermal/material condition and defined observations under the manufacturer and site's safe acceptance method.
Keep unknown relationships open. A nominal radius or orifice without the mating drawing and approval is not compatibility evidence.
| Field | Record for the proposed interface | Evidence to request |
|---|---|---|
| Interface identity | Mold, machine/injection unit, nozzle-tip assembly, sprue bush or hot-runner inlet, drawing revisions and responsible owners | Controlled machine/injection-unit and mold or hot-runner interface drawings |
| Machine nozzle seat | Tip style, spherical radius or flat-seat geometry, contact-face condition and replaceable component identity | Configured nozzle-tip drawing, part identity and inspection record |
| Mold inlet seat | Sprue-bush or machine-interface seat geometry, radius/flat condition, inlet identity and contact-face condition | Mold or hot-runner drawing plus component supplier documentation |
| Radius or seat pairing | Written approval of the two mating geometries, including the product-specific relationship and any permitted alternatives | Released interface drawing or approval from the responsible machine, mold and component parties |
| Melt-channel transition | Nozzle outlet/orifice, sprue or hot-runner inlet, transition direction and the approved relationship between the two | Dimensioned section view and material/process review; no inferred universal match |
| Location and alignment | Locating ring/interface, platen and mold datums, centerline requirement, fit/condition and verification method | Installation drawing, mold setup record and agreed alignment check |
| Contact position | Nozzle protrusion, carriage/contact position, forward travel or stop basis and allowable configured range | Current general-assembly or installation drawing and configured setup record |
| Contact mode and force | Continuous or retracting contact strategy, supplier-approved contact basis, mold-open state and change permissions | Machine/injection-unit instructions and released mold-specific setup |
| Thermal and material state | Resin, nozzle and inlet thermal state, contact duration, startup/changeover condition and any approved limits | Current material, machine and hot-runner instructions plus trial record |
| Acceptance observations | Visible leakage/weepage, deposits, seat marks or damage, cold material, color carryover and stable contact during the defined trial | Time-stamped inspection and representative-run record linked to the configuration |
| Change and handover | Approved spare tip/bush identities, recheck triggers, cleaning/inspection ownership, deviations and final release authority | Controlled parts list, setup/maintenance handover and signed deviation closure |
The sequence is a procurement handoff, not an adjustment, inspection or operating procedure.
Record the exact machine or injection unit, mold, nozzle-tip assembly, sprue bush or hot-runner inlet and every drawing revision before comparing dimensions.
Compare the seat geometry, melt-channel transition, protrusion/contact position, locating datums and available travel in one controlled section view.
Ask the responsible machine, mold and component parties to approve the radius/seat and outlet/inlet relationships. Do not infer one universal offset or equality.
Document the alignment check, contact mode and approved setup basis for the identified mold and machine rather than relying on nominal component labels.
Use the manufacturer and site's safe procedure with representative material and conditions, then record contact, leakage and melt-path observations without treating one symptom as a complete diagnosis.
Retain drawings, setup records, observations, deviations, spare identities and recheck triggers so a nozzle, bush, mold or injection-unit change cannot silently break the interface.
Use the configured drawings, component instructions and safe investigation plan to separate geometry, condition, setup, thermal and process contributors.
Record the location, timing, material and machine state. Leakage is an investigation trigger, not proof that radius mismatch is the only cause.
Inspect under the approved shutdown and energy-control procedure. Preserve photos and component identity before repair or replacement changes the evidence.
Record the thermal and material-change context. Review the channel transition and possible stagnant regions without claiming the interface is the only cause.
Record carriage/contact behavior, mold location and the configured setup. Refer adjustment decisions to the current machine, mold and component instructions.
The sources establish interface fields and attributed failure or flow-path examples. They do not prove a supplier configuration, prescribe one fit for every system or provide an operating procedure.
The official catalog describes the sprue bushing as providing a spherical-radius seat for the press nozzle and a material path, and it records radius and orifice as ordering fields.
Boundary: The catalog establishes interface fields, not a universal nozzle/bush radius or orifice relationship for every mold and machine.
The official FAQ tells users of the named assembly to select an appropriately sized nozzle-tip radius and size the nozzle exit orifice to the sprue inlet.
Boundary: This is product-specific DME guidance. The wording is not converted into a numeric rule or generalized to cold sprues, hot runners or other suppliers.
The official manual ties nozzle protrusion to the required contact condition, warns that incorrect adjustment may leak, and directs users to the installation or assembly drawing for the allowed range.
Boundary: The described adjustment and limits apply to the stated E-Multi equipment. This page uses only the procurement principle that the configured drawing controls.
The official troubleshooting section identifies a non-aligned nozzle contact radius and a damaged sealing surface as possible leakage conditions near the machine nozzle.
Boundary: These are HASCO hot-runner troubleshooting examples, not proof that either condition is the sole cause of leakage in another system.
The official article illustrates the machine-nozzle/sprue-bushing melt-channel interface and describes mismatch as a possible stagnant-material region in its color-change context.
Boundary: The article supports checking the transition. It does not prescribe dimensions, promise color-change performance or establish a NEW ORIENTAL IMM configuration.
OSHA identifies hot-plastic, purge and mold-area hazards and describes guarding and energy-control expectations for applicable work.
Boundary: The page supplies a safety boundary only. Applicable law, the machine/cell risk assessment and the site's authorized procedure govern the actual work.
These answers prevent catalogue labels and product-specific examples from becoming unsupported universal rules.
Do not assume one universal relationship. Record both controlled geometries and use the current machine, mold and component instructions to approve the actual pair. A product-specific example cannot be generalized into a rule for every interface.
Do not infer equality from a catalogue label. Record the nozzle outlet, the sprue or hot-runner inlet and the transition shown on the controlled section drawing, then obtain the responsible parties' approval for the material and process.
No. A locating feature helps establish the interface, but the approved datum scheme, component condition, mold installation and verification method still belong in the setup and acceptance record.
No. Leakage is a symptom that requires a controlled investigation. Preserve the location and operating context, then review the contact faces, alignment, protrusion/contact setup, thermal state, component condition and other applicable causes.
No. It is a procurement and evidence checklist. Work around a hot, pressurized nozzle or mold area must follow the machine and component instructions, applicable rules, the cell risk assessment and the site's authorized shutdown, guarding, PPE and energy-control procedure.
Include both interface drawings and revisions; nozzle-tip and sprue-bush identities; seat and melt-channel geometries; locating/alignment basis; contact position, mode and approval basis; material/thermal conditions; acceptance observations; spares; deviations; and recheck triggers.
Attach both drawings, component identities, seat and melt-channel relationships, locating/contact basis, material/thermal conditions, acceptance observations, deviations, spares and recheck triggers.
Build the machine brief